Current:Home > StocksJudge strikes down Biden administration program shielding immigrant spouses from deportation -ProsperityStream Academy
Judge strikes down Biden administration program shielding immigrant spouses from deportation
View
Date:2025-04-12 22:52:38
A federal judge on Thursday struck down a Biden administration policy that aimed to ease a path to citizenship for some undocumented immigrants who are married to U.S. citizens.
The program, lauded as one of the biggest presidential actions to help immigrant families in years, allowed undocumented spouses and stepchildren of U.S. citizens to apply for a green card without first having to leave the country.
The temporary relief from deportation brought a brief sense of security to some 500,000 immigrants estimated to benefit from the program before Texas-based U.S. District Judge J. Campbell Barker put it on hold in August, days after applicants filed their paperwork.
Barker ruled Thursday that the Biden administration had overstepped its authority by implementing the program and had stretched the legal interpretation of relevant immigration law “past its breaking point.”
The short-lived Biden administration initiative known as “Keeping Families Together” would have been unlikely to remain in place after Donald Trump took office in January. But its early termination creates greater uncertainty for immigrant families as many are bracing for Trump’s return to the White House.
Trump’s election victory this week sets the stage for a swift crackdown on undocumented individuals after the Republican ran on promises of “mass deportation.” The president-elect energized his supporters on the campaign trail with a litany anti-immigrant statements, including that immigrants were “poisoning the blood” of the nation.
During his first term, Trump appointed Barker as a judge in Tyler, Texas, which lies in the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, a favored venue for advocates pushing conservative arguments.
Barker had placed the immigration initiative on hold after Texas and 15 other states, led by their Republican attorneys general, filed a legal challenge accusing the executive branch of bypassing Congress to help immigrant families for “blatant political purposes.”
Republicans argued the initiative created costs for their states and could draw more migrants to the U.S.
The policy would have applied to people who have been living continuously in the U.S. for at least 10 years, do not pose a security threat and have utilized the existing legal authority known as “parole in place” that offers deportation protections.
Those married to a citizen by June 17, the day before the program was announced, could pay a $580 application fee and fill out a lengthy application explaining why they deserve humanitarian parole. If approved, applicants would have three years to seek permanent residency and obtain work authorization.
It was not immediately clear Thursday whether anyone had received approval under the program, which only accepted applications for about a week before the federal judge placed it on hold.
Noncitizen spouses are already eligible for legal status but often have to apply from their home countries. The process typically includes a years-long wait outside of the U.S., which can separate family members with different immigration statuses.
veryGood! (9)
Related
- The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
- Biden administration says 100,000 new migrants are expected to enroll in ‘Obamacare’ next year
- Amid arrests and chaos, Columbia's student radio station stayed on air. America listened.
- In Israel, Blinken says Hamas must accept cease-fire deal, offers cautious optimism to hostage families
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Georgia approves contract for Kirby Smart making him the highest-paid coach at public school
- Dramatic video shows Indonesia's Mount Ruang volcano erupting as lightning fills clouds of hot gas and debris
- Former Michigan House leader, wife plead not guilty to misusing political funds
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- North Carolina Senate OKs $500 million for expanded private school vouchers
Ranking
- Small twin
- Small plane crashed into residential Georgia neighborhood, killing pilot
- RHONJ Stars Face Off Like Never Before in Shocking Season 14 Teaser
- Sixers purchase, plan to give away Game 6 tickets to keep Knicks fans out
- NHL in ASL returns, delivering American Sign Language analysis for Deaf community at Winter Classic
- What defines a heartbeat? Judge hears arguments in South Carolina abortion case
- Britney Spears and Sam Asghari’s Spousal Support Decision Revealed
- Authorities arrest man suspected of fatally shooting 1 person, wounding 2 others in northern Arizona
Recommendation
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Brittney Griner 'Coming Home' interview shows not just her ordeal in Russia, but her humanity
Matthew and Camila McConaughey go pantsless again for Pantalones tequila promotion
Jill Biden is hosting a White House ‘state dinner’ to honor America’s 2024 teachers of the year
Krispy Kreme offers a free dozen Grinch green doughnuts: When to get the deal
What are PFAS? 'Forever chemicals' are common and dangerous.
Campaign to legalize sports betting in Missouri gets help from mascots to haul voter signatures
Man arrested in fatal shooting of Chicago police officer who was heading home from work