Current:Home > ContactPredictIQ-George Santos due in court, expected to plead guilty in fraud case, AP source says -ProsperityStream Academy
PredictIQ-George Santos due in court, expected to plead guilty in fraud case, AP source says
Ethermac Exchange View
Date:2025-04-07 06:20:14
Former U.S. Rep. George Santos is PredictIQdue in court Monday afternoon, where a person familiar with the matter has said the New York Republican is expected to plead guilty to multiple counts in his federal fraud case.
The person could not publicly discuss details of the plea and spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity. Santos and his attorneys did not return requests for comment.
The case has been set to go to trial early next month. The Monday afternoon court date on Long Island was scheduled only on Friday at the request of both prosecutors and Santos’ lawyers. A letter making the request did not specify what it would be about.
Santos has previously pleaded not guilty to a range of alleged financial crimes, including lying to Congress about his wealth, collecting unemployment benefits while actually working and using campaign contributions to pay for personal expenses.
The 36-year-old was once touted as a rising political star after he flipped the suburban district that covers the affluent North Shore of Long Island and a slice of the New York City borough of Queens in 2022.
But his life story began unraveling before he was even sworn into office. At the time, reports emerged that he had lied about having a career at top Wall Street firms and a college degree along with other questions of his biography.
New questions then emerged about his campaign funds.
He was first indicted on federal charges in May 2023, but refused to resign from office. Santos was expelled from Congress after an ethics investigation found “overwhelming evidence” that he had broken the law and exploited his public position for his own profit.
Santos has previously maintained his innocence, though he said in an interview in December that a plea deal with prosecutors was “not off the table.”
Asked if he was afraid of going to prison, he told CBS 2 at the time: “I think everybody should be afraid of going to jail, it’s not a pretty place and uh, I definitely want to work very hard to avoid that as best as possible.”
As the trial date neared in recent weeks, Santos had sought to have a partially anonymous jury, with his lawyers arguing in court papers that “the mere risk of public ridicule could influence the individual jurors ability to decide Santos’ case solely on the facts and law as presented in Court.”
He also wanted potential jurors to fill out a written questionnaire gauging their opinions of him. His lawyers argued the survey was needed because “for all intents and purposes, Santos has already been found guilty in the court of public opinion.”
Judge Joanna Seybert agreed to keep jurors’ identities public but said no to the questionnaire.
Prosecutors, meanwhile, had been seeking to admit as evidence some of the financial falsehoods Santos told during his campaign, including that he’d worked at Citigroup and Goldman Sachs and that he had operated a family-run firm with approximately $80 million in assets,
Two Santos campaign aides have already pleaded guilty to crimes related to the former congressman’s campaign.
His ex-treasurer, Nancy Marks, pleaded guilty in October to a fraud conspiracy charge, implicating Santos in an alleged scheme to embellish his campaign finance reports with a fake loan and fake donors. A lawyer for Marks said at the time his client would be willing to testify against Santos if asked.
Sam Miele, a former fundraiser for Santos, pleaded guilty a month later to a federal wire fraud charge, admitting he impersonated a high-ranking congressional aide while raising money for Santos’ campaign.
___
Associated Press writer Michael R. Sisak contributed to this report.
veryGood! (94132)
Related
- SFO's new sensory room helps neurodivergent travelers fight flying jitters
- In a new video, Dylan Mulvaney says Bud Light never reached out to her amid backlash
- Shein steals artists' designs, a federal racketeering lawsuit says
- The marketing whiz behind chia pets and their iconic commercials has died
- Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
- Microsoft says Chinese hackers breached email, including U.S. government agencies
- Are Amazon Prime Day deals worth it? 5 things to know
- U.S. is barred from combating disinformation on social media. Here's what it means
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- The artists shaking up the industry at the Latin Alternative Music Conference
Ranking
- Jamie Foxx reps say actor was hit in face by a glass at birthday dinner, needed stitches
- Fracking Company to Pay for Public Water System in Rural Pennsylvania Town
- Meta's Threads wants to become a 'friendly' place by downgrading news and politics
- Petition Circulators Are Telling California Voters that a Ballot Measure Would Ban New Oil and Gas Wells Near Homes. In Fact, It Would Do the Opposite
- Skins Game to make return to Thanksgiving week with a modern look
- 8 mistakes to avoid if you're going out in the heat
- Tribes object. But a federal ruling approves construction of the largest lithium mine
- Outnumbered: In Rural Ohio, Two Supporters of Solar Power Step Into a Roomful of Opposition
Recommendation
Tree trimmer dead after getting caught in wood chipper at Florida town hall
It's hot. For farmworkers without federal heat protections, it could be life or death
Fox pays $12 million to resolve suit alleging bias at Tucker Carlson's show
Olaplex Is on Sale for Amazon Prime Day 2023 at a Major Discount: Don’t Miss Out on Shiny, Strong Hair
Can Bill Belichick turn North Carolina into a winner? At 72, he's chasing one last high
Russia says talks possible on prisoner swap for detained U.S. reporter
How Decades of Hard-Earned Protections and Restoration Reversed the Collapse of California’s Treasured Mono Lake
Summer School 1: Planet Money goes to business school