Current:Home > InvestTexas, other GOP-led states sue over program to give immigrant spouses of US citizens legal status -ProsperityStream Academy
Texas, other GOP-led states sue over program to give immigrant spouses of US citizens legal status
View
Date:2025-04-13 20:46:31
Sixteen Republican-led states are suing to end a federal program that could potentially give nearly half a million immigrants without legal status who are married to U.S. citizens a path to citizenship.
The coalition filed suit Friday to halt the program launched by President Joe Biden in June, saying in court filings that the Biden administration bypassed Congress to create a pathway to citizenship for “blatant political purposes.”
“This action incentivizes illegal immigration and will irreparably harm the Plaintiff states,” the suit says.
Under the policy, which started taking applications Monday, many spouses without legal status can apply for something called “parole in place,” offering permission to stay in the U.S., apply for a green card and eventually get on a path to citizenship.
But the program has been particularly contentious in an election year where immigration is one of the biggest issues, with many Republicans attacking the policy and contending it is essentially a form of amnesty for people who broke the law.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said in a statement Friday that the plan “violates the Constitution and actively worsens the illegal immigration disaster that is hurting Texas and our country.”
The suit filed against the Department of Homeland Security, DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and other Biden administration officials accuses the agency of attempting to parole spouses “en masse,” which the states contend is an abuse of power.
The Department of Homeland Security and the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Associated Press.
The bipartisan immigration and criminal justice organization FWD.us noted the timing of the lawsuit — as Kamala Harris accepted the Democratic nomination for president — and said the program is in compliance with the law.
“The only motivation behind this lawsuit is the cruelty of tearing families apart and the crass politics of hoping a judge might do the bidding of the anti-immigrant movement,” the organization said in a statement.
To be eligible for the program, immigrants must have lived continuously in the U.S. for at least 10 years, not pose a security threat or have a disqualifying criminal history, and have been married to a citizen by June 17 — the day before the program was announced.
They must pay a $580 fee to apply and fill out a lengthy application, including an explanation of why they deserve humanitarian parole and a long list of supporting documents proving how long they have been in the country.
They apply to the Department of Homeland Security, and if approved, have three years to seek permanent residency. During that period, they can get work authorization. The administration estimates about 500,000 people could be eligible, plus about 50,000 of their children.
Before this program, it was complicated for people who were in the U.S. illegally to get a green card after marrying an American citizen. They can be required to return to their home country — often for years — and they always face the risk they may not be allowed back in.
veryGood! (49613)
Related
- Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
- Stars' Jason Robertson breaks slump with Game 3 hat trick in win against Oilers
- 2 new giant pandas are returning to Washington’s National Zoo from China by the end of the year
- 'Serial slingshot shooter' accused of terrorizing California neighborhood for a decade
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- Sludge from Mormon cricket invasion causes multiple crashes in Nevada
- Biden campaign sends allies De Niro and first responders to Trump’s NY trial to put focus on Jan. 6
- Pilot injured after a military aircraft crashes near international airport in Albuquerque
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- Dance Moms' Kelly Hyland Reveals Breast Cancer Diagnosis
Ranking
- Buckingham Palace staff under investigation for 'bar brawl'
- North West's 'Lion King' concert performance sparks casting backlash: 'The nepotism was clear'
- National Park Service denies ordering removal of American flag at Denali National Park
- Stetson Bennett took break for mental health last season, 'excited' to be with LA Rams
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Louisiana authorities search for 2 escaped jail inmates
- What is Manhattanhenge and when can you see it?
- Billionaire plans to take submersible to Titanic nearly one year after OceanGate implosion
Recommendation
A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
Authorities urge proper cooking of wild game after 6 relatives fall ill from parasite in bear meat
Pennsylvania’s Fracking Wastewater Contains a ‘Shocking’ Amount of the Critical Clean Energy Mineral Lithium
Hilarie Burton Shares Rare Glimpse Into Family Life With Jeffrey Dean Morgan for 15-Year Milestone
See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
Cross restored to Notre Dame cathedral more than 5 years after fire
Linen Clothing Is the Chicest Way To Stay Cool This Summer: What To Buy Right Now
College in Detroit suspends in-person classes because of pro-Palestinian camp